Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 08:05

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
How can someone living alone in their own apartment reduce the cost of their electric bills?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thousands of Norwegians mistakenly told they won millions in lottery - CBS News
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Macklemore’s Seattle home reportedly robbed with his 3 children inside - New York Post
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
ISS Research & Development Conference Cancellation - NASA Watch
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: